Category Archives: Human Behavior

Jorge Moll and the Science of Generosity

Jorge Moll, a researcher of cognitive and behavioral neuroscience and current Director at the D’Or Institute for Research and Education, is changing the way people think about generosity. Today, many people assume that science knows all there is to know about the world. However, Moll is showing that there are still fields in which true answers are beyond our ken. The argument of nature versus nurture is extending to the concept or morality and generosity, areas in which Moll is a leading expert.

Innovative Study of Human Brain

Moll and others are utilizing advances in technology to review brain activity of those who are undergoing the thought processes that lead to generosity, and making revolutionary discoveries regarding the fact that morality may not be as much of a product of our societal expectations as it is hardwired in the brain ( Giving philosophers something to mull over, Jorge Moll and others in his field are discovering that there does appear to be something hard wired in the brain to incline people to behave in what society has deemed a moral manner based on thousands of years of evolutionary design. Jorge Moll’s work makes one re-evaluate thousands of years of thought on what makes humans moral. Due to these revolutionary ideas in the field of morality and generosity, Moll’s work also leads to further discussion on what the repercussions of hard wired morality mean for people as individuals as well as society as a whole.

If Moll’s work is correct, and there is a link between hard wired morality and how people act, the discussion about free will and personal responsibility is quick to follow. Jorge Moll’s work has implications for many different fields including philosophy, law, and justice. While reassuring that people are hard wired to feel generous and inclined to the same standard of morality, the implications for those who have damage to the brain in the areas associated with morality and generosity would raise the question if they can be held responsible for immoral or non-generous acts. Moll’s work is fascinating and deserves more widespread recognition and discussion.