Earlier this year, May 9th specifically, Territory and Power in Constitutional Transition was published on Amazon. Territory and Power in Constitutional Transitions is considered a vital academic read for those interested in the vast and varient workings of the Law, specifically. The reason for this being that the book contains a collection of essays, seventeen in total, that survey the range of challenges that territorial conflicts can pose for the constitution-making processes and constitutional design. How indepth does the book go? Well, the case studies cover countries going through intense constitutional engagement periods in a variety of contexts such as bi-communal countries, small distinct countries, and highly diverse countries. Examplses are often drawn from countries like Kenya, Spain, Scotland, South Africa, and many others. The collection prides itself on policy recommendations through a realist lens.
Where do Sujit Choudhry and George Anderson fit into this? Well, they stand as editors to the collection and had additonally released a companion policy paper with the goal of providing insight into the constitution-making process and offer advice. The two speak from experience, as Choudhry is the founder and director of the Center of Constitutional Transitions and has assisted in the constitution building for such countries as Egypt, Yemen, Ukraine, Sri Lanka alongside other a variety of other countries. Anderson has experience as a former deputy minister for the Canadian government. Anderson is also the former CEO for the Forum of Federations. Currently he works at the Centre for Democracy and Diversity at Queen’s University.
Find out more here https://www.crunchbase.com/person/sujit-choudhry
Sujit Choudhry is a globally acclaimed lawyer, speaker and author in the field of constitution building and comparative law. He has been active in the field for over three decades and has the strong belief that comparative law is one of the underused laws in today’s date while being highly relevant in modern times. He is often consulted by the governments of different countries across the globe regarding constitution building and reformation and has also participated in the constitution building process of numerous countries, including Sri Lanka, Jordan, Tunisia, Libya, and others.
He has written and spoken on many critical global issues, including Catalan secession, middle-east crisis, and political situation in Ukraine. The inputs provided by Sujit Choudhry has been widely admired and taken for consideration by many governments to resolve their ongoing crisis in countries like Sri Lanka and Ukraine. Sujit Choudhry is also the founder of the Center for Constitutional Transitions, one of the most notable organizations helping create awareness in the field of law about comparative law and its importance worldwide. Sujit Choudhry is also one of the first people of Indian origin to become the dean of the top law college in the United States, the Berkeley Law College.
Sujit Choudhry is not afraid to face challenges, and it is the reason why he was one of the experts to visit Sri Lanka in 2003 when it was facing problems from ethnic groups. Since he has expertise in the cultures around the world, he was asked to accompany a group of experts to help solve the problems. During that time he had to travel to remote places in Sri Lanka where they were often checked by guards with guns. But, Sujit always stood for the rights of people and wanted to do the same no matter how hard it was.
Find out more here https://www.ssrn.com/abstract_id=363220
George Soros used to be one of the biggest people who was supportive of the different things that people could do and he wanted to make things better for all of the people who were in the United States. He had seen, firsthand, what could happen when things got hard in the countries and knew that it would make things more complicated for the people who were living in the United States at that time. George Soros took a break, though, with the things that he was doing and decided to step back from the scene in order to become more focused on the things that he was doing in his personal life. He was raising money and becoming more prominent with the things that he could do. Since then, though, he has decided that it will be a great idea for him to come back to politics. Follow George Soros on twitter.com.
According to Politico, George Soros is back and he is going to continue to make things better for people who are in different places throughout the United States. he is going to consistently try to make things better and wants to offer people the opportunities that they can get from different areas of politics that they have chosen to support for their own good. There have been many different ways that he has been doing things and George Soros knows that everything will get better no matter what is going on in the country or with politics.
The true sign that George Soros was back was that he was supporting Clinton in the latest presidential campaign. While he has a lot of money, he also has the connections that he can offer the people who are a part of the campaign. He wanted to make sure that his money was going to a great cause and that the people of the United States would be able to benefit from everything that he was doing. It was not something that he wanted to do to make his own life better but he also knew that all of this would change the way that things would work for people so that they could have better lives.
Despite the fact that George Soros had helped political candidates in the past, the Clinton campaign was the one that he had spent the most amount of money on. He had a lot tied up in this campaign and it gave him the chance to try and make things better for people who wanted to get more from the situations that they were in. All of the things that George Soros had done for other campaigns and for other people who needed his help translated into the things that he could do with the Clinton campaign. Know more on CNBC about George Soros.
Helane Morrison is a resident of Brooklyn, New York City. She is a graduate of North- western University, Illinois and of California Berkeley School of law, from where she attained her honours in both Journalism and Law respectively. She obtained a Juries’ Doctor after working as an editor in- Chief of the California Law Review. She also worked at the State Bar of California before going more private in her work. Her work majorly encompassed protection of private securities, and she also worked on many business law suits, heading numerous investigations linked to vulnerable investors and giving them hope to see another day in their road to greater investment opportunities. She is an author of financial matters, providing knowledge and skills necessary in the investment sector. She is a true believer of the fact that sharing of knowledge is a way of achieving immortality.
In the investment sector, fair dealings are top- notch priority. One also is required to maintain very high standards. These are all qualities that Helane Morrison stands for. She is up to protecting business companies and individual investors against falsehood. Honesty is one key principle in investment banking and that is what Helane Morrison offers. At work place, she always campaigns against inequality believing that in this, both women and men can deliver equally. She also advocates for business ethics and believes that it is with this that all business entities can propel to the next level. She is a true believer of change and she is always wants to make everything seem right around her for the betterment of not only the running of the firm but also for the betterment of the services they get to offer.
She is a member of the board of The Regional Parks Foundation and therefore a lover of the environment and a great advocate of animal rights.
Financial institutions fell down suddenly as a result of an international economic crisis seemingly as a result of deception and of false records and dirty dealings that speak volumes of the corruption in this sector. Unemployment escalated, money was converted to precious stones and a sense of insecurity set in. This state has remained the same for a long time and it is not promising to change soon.
Helane proclaims the essence to be well armed with the knowledge and skills and relevant information in order to make the best out of any investment.
Here are 5 myths that have been advanced since the Koch brothers joined politics.
The first myth is that the Koch brothers
have emerged to fight the Obama administration. Since the early 1970s the Koch brothers have been involved with American politics. The brothers were not convinced by proposals advanced by the then presidential hopeful George Bush in 2003 and decided to do something about it. That is when they started fundraisers that have come to be known as Americans for Prosperity (AFP) IN 2004.
The second myth is that their network is a toy experiment. Their organization has grown over the years and has attracted over 500 donors since its inception. The Koch network meets twice a year and donates money in excess of 300 million dollars annually. This is a direct pointer that the network is just a group of wealthy like-minded conservative citizens to better American politics. The brothers do not have the ability to sway other multi-millionaires and billionaires.
The third myth sates that the brothers represent other companies that are featured in their network. This is not true since the brothers have opposed some reforms advanced by republicans. Charles Koch has been at logger heads with some industrialists who had previously supported them during the Obama care deliberations.
The fourth myth that the Koch brothers network is a secret and mysterious organizations set to finance democrats is unfounded. The organization is set up in such a manner that donations flow from members and the network is transparently run by the brothers and their allies.
The fifth myth is that the network is another political party in US. There are two parties in America: the Democrats and Republicans. The Koch network cannot be compared to either of these parties nor can it act as a political party. It exists due to the existence of these parties hence it cannot be termed as a third political party.
Charles Koch is one of the two billionaire brothers that run the Koch Empire. He is said to be a focused man that believes in the freedom of markets. He has categorically stated over the years that the government should not interfere with businesses. Charles was born in Wichita, Kansas and states that although he came from a wealthy family he worked to attain the position he now holds at Koch Enterprises. Charles Koch is well educated having attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he obtained his degree and later two masters certificates.
Charles Koch agrees with Bernie Sanders on the issue that inequality is on the rise in the United States currently. In Washington Post op-ed, he states that he believes that the current society has numerous citizens who are living in hopelessness and poverty where the system seems to be propagating the situation. Charles Koch is of the opinion that most corporations are benefiting from corporate welfare whereas the common or ordinary citizens don’t have the same level playing ground. Such citizens have been denied different opportunities to operate on a level playing ground.
The current system, he argues, helps to propagate a cycle of dependency and control. The government, however, may not necessarily be the only one to blame because even the business sector has encouraged and is seemingly in support of this. Both Koch and Sanders agree and are against bad inequality as expressed above. There may be a slight disagreement between them on the bits of which aspects of the inequalities are indeed bad. The criminal justice system is also one of the areas in which the two agree on. The two agree that the system is in dire need of reform.
Charles thereby favors the ordinary citizen and seeks to ensure that the current policies are changed in order to provide a level playing ground for everyone. The current system seems to favor the affluent and oppress the poor and disadvantaged. Charles Koch has been on the forefront to always defend the welfare of the ordinary citizen. He does this even if the policy that has been put in place is one that would benefit him as one of the affluent in the society. Charles is one the brothers who own Koch Industries. Koch Industries is the second largest American corporation in the United States. Charles’ brother, David went ahead of him and ran for presidency in 1980. He did it on the Libertarian ticket. The two have bankrolled a few libertarian think tanks like Cato Institute and American Enterprise Institute and have funded a number of groups who coalesced in 2009 into the Tea Party.
In his opinions and policies, Charles has been quite vocal in voicing the fact that the government should look at the impact of policies and not so much the intention. It is pointless if the intentions are to ensure that the poor benefit but the impact once the policy is put in place differs with that. He argues like Sanders does that the most legible principle is one that allows for a free society. This should be regardless of which party one is in.
This article recapped https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-koch-this-is-the-one-issue-where-bernie-sanders-is-right/2016/02/18/cdd2c228-d5c1-11e5-be55-2cc3c1e4b76b_story.html
In today’s society not many people know about the Koch brothers, much less about their political influence on the American Presidential candidates. Charles Koch was born and raised in Wichita, Kansas nearly eighty yeas ago. He is an American businessman and philanthropist. As head of Koch industries, America’s second largest corporation, he took his fathers company from $50 million in revenue to an estimated $100 billion dollar net revenue. He holds three degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in engineering. In 2011 Charles was named one of the most influential people by Time magazine.
So what would make America’s fourth riches man want to get involved in politics? Charles is one of the most politically influential
men in America,raising an estimated $400 million for the 2012 Presidential election. His hope is to get a conservative Republican president who will agree with his libertarian views
and standards. In August 2015, Charles hosted the Freedom Partners Policy Leaders conference. Republican hopefuls Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were in attendance, vying for political funding by the Koch brothers and their donors. Presidential hopeful Donald Trump was not invited, to which Mr. Trump took to Twitter calling the other Presidential candidates “Puppets”, for begging for the Koch brothers money. Charles is deeply disappointed by his lack of influence in this years election and is equally distressed by the candidates running.
Donald Trump has been a thorn in his side, since he refused to back Donald in his bid for the Presidency. It is ironic, Charles bemoans a political playground he helped shape. His political network has in the past, helped fund the Tea Party and the GOP. They have bought 44,000 political ads and have raised nearly $900 million for this years Republican Presidential candidate. However, if Donald Trump becomes the candidate to face Hillary C!inton or Bernie Sanders, the funds will go to discredit Mr. Trump by focusing on his strong business deals and personal bankruptcies.
Donald Trump’s political agenda goes against everything the Koch brothers Libertarian views, hopes to accomplish. The Koch political machine is cloaked in secrecy though well funded by a network of donors that cannot be traced. It funds think tanks, recruitmenns and political elections. If Charles decides to take on Trump, his think tanks will not be able to successfully do damage control.
On Thursday, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham announced that he will be retiring from the Air Force Reserve this summer. That said, it really doesn’t have anything to do with his looming presidential candidacy. Rather, the Air Force Reserve requires servicemen to retire upon reaching age 60, which Graham will reach this summer. As for his service in the reserves, he is a judge advocate general (JAG) officer. Initially, he served 6.5 years on active duty during the late 80s and early 90s. By 1995, he switched to serve in the reserves at the same time he began his career as a member of congress.
Graham is widely expected to announce a presidential campaign. He made it known his mentor, Arizona Senator John McCain, has been urging him to run for higher office. Graham has been McCain’s top lieutenant on immigration and campaign finance reform. He is known as being pro-defense. It is in the area of foreign policy where Graham has most of his experience. He believes this uniquely qualifies him for the office of the president according to Adam Sender on artmarketmonitor.com. Likewise, the senator will be counting on support from the Hispanic Community for his pro-amnesty views. His popularity in his home state of South Carolina should play well for him. The critical primary marks the first of the Southern primaries. That said, his views on immigration reform have alienated Tea Party conservatives which renders his campaign a long shot.